NRU Leaks

Old reactors like old people often become incontinent.

 

This is certainly the case with NRU.  It had some minor leaks in early December 2008 which just made the headlines last week. At the outset I should commend the operators of NRU for doing a wonderful job of keeping that old and leaky reactor running.  It was widely recognized twenty years ago that it needed to be replaced and but for the failure of the MAPLE project would have long since been retired.

 

If the politicians want NRU to continue producing isotopes then they will have to accept that there will be continuing problems of this type until it is finally shut down. To express outrage at not being informed each time it piddles a little bit is simply playing to the gallery. Similarly for the media to trumpet every incident as apocalyptic is a waste of public adrenaline. As for the nuclear medicine docs whose primary concern is for the welfare of their patients and certainly not for their wallets, they should know that knocking NRU is not going to help keep it operating.

 

Nothing significant happened at NRU in December but the incident was totally blown out of all proportion. This is a great example of my previous post on the corrosive effects of secrecy on the nuclear industry. In my opinion the solution for AECL is to issue a press release every time anything happens at NRU. This would go a long way to re-establishing the transparency and honesty that the nuclear industry so badly needs. As I see it, letting the media find out by reading reports to the regulator (CNSC) is dumb because it’s just asking for accusations of secrecy. Swamp the media with information and with their short attention spans they’ll soon get bored and move on to the next titillating episode in the life of Brittany Spears, Jessica Simpson or someone of that ilk.

 

In this vein, here’s an anecdote about the current head of a famous nuclear company. When protestors in a small town accused her of concealing leaks that endangered public health at a nearby nuclear facility she managed, she offered to give them any radiation monitoring equipment they wanted to take away to do their own measurements. All they had to do is to return it to the city hall when they were done. They took her up on the offer and the protests stopped. We could use that kind of imagination and the indications are looking more and more like that we might even get it, albeit indirectly, from the lady herself.

2 Responses to “NRU Leaks”

  1. Don Jones Says:

    Maybe AECL and the CNSC should invite media reporters to Chalk River for a Radiation 101. All expenses paid of course, including drinks!

  2. Steve Aplin Says:

    I guess the other side of the argument is, if AECL were to publish every incident or non-incident at Chalk River, that would provide that much more ammo for the anti-nuke nuts and the Gatekeepers of Newsworthiness. But you’re right, swamp ’em with information until they get bored and run after the Obama bandwagon. And hasten this situation by, as Don suggests, holding regular media briefings with lots of free drinks and sandwiches, and let them wander around with monitoring equipment.

    AECL probably worries too much about the ease with which anti-nukes can combine linear-no-threshold with the precautionary principle to turn every non-event into the Apocalypse. Maybe not enough people know that Greenpeace, Sierra, etc. are the biggest wolf-criers on the planet.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: